Logo

He Effed Around, Now He’s Finding Out: War Secretary Hegseth Drops Hammer On ‘Seditious’ Mark Kelly

He Effed Around, Now He’s Finding Out: War Secretary Hegseth Drops Hammer On ‘Seditious’ Mark Kelly

They were dubbed the “Seditious Six”—a half dozen lawmakers, all with prior service in the intelligence community and/or the military, who released a video on November 18 urging active-duty troops to refuse orders they personally deemed unlawful. To many observers, it looked like exactly what it was: a thinly veiled invitation to rebellion within the ranks.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth was clearly having none of it. On Monday, he dropped the hammer in a blunt social-media post, calling the video exactly what it was: “seditious” while singling out Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, a retired US Navy captain, who just found out after he effed around:

House Poised To Extend ACA Subsidies As Hope Grows For Deal




The House is set to approve legislation on Thursday afternoon that will extend controversial Obamacare tax credits for three years, representing a significant triumph for Democrats and fostering optimism among centrist Republicans that it may facilitate a bipartisan agreement to restore the subsidies.

The proposal is unlikely to progress through the Senate in its current form. The identical three-year extension was defeated by Senate Republicans in December.

However, the impending vote prompted a coalition of bipartisan senators to formulate a compromise capable of garnering support from both legislative chambers.

Republican supporters in the House, including centrist dissenters who endorsed a Democratic discharge petition to compel the vote, are optimistic that a bipartisan vote in the lower chamber on Thursday will prompt the Senate to expedite its consideration of the issue.


Representative Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the four Republicans who diverged from leadership to endorse the discharge petition, stated he anticipates “a substantial number of Republicans” will support the bill to advocate for a bipartisan agreement to renew, reform, and prolong the subsidies.

“We’ve been working with the senators for weeks, and the framework that they are … trying to finalize is very much in line with what I have been saying from the start, about a two-year extension with reforms,” Lawler added. “I think that’s ultimately where we can get.”
The dispute regarding the augmented Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies has persisted on Capitol Hill for several months, revisiting previous conflicts concerning the government’s involvement in the national health care system and directly resulting in the Democrat-led 43-day government shutdown last fall.

In the absence of an agreement, approximately 22 million individuals receiving subsidies will experience a surge in their healthcare expenses in the initial months of this year.

The prospect of cost increases prompted the Republican moderates to compel Thursday’s vote. Democrats, perceiving health care as a favorable electoral issue in November, are advocating from the periphery, cautioning of a political debacle if GOP leaders fail to extend the subsidies that lapsed on December 31.

“Something better happen,” Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) said. “I don’t think that Trump will be able to Venezuela his way out of the problems around not extending these credits.”

The bipartisan initiative has underscored the difficulties confronting President Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), and other Republican leaders regarding health care, an issue that has long divided the party and represents a significant impediment to their efforts to maintain control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections in November.


A significant number of Republicans sought to circumvent the issue entirely by permitting the enhanced ACA subsidies, instituted by former President Biden as an emergency measure during the COVID-19 pandemic, to lapse permanently.

Numerous contentious issues must be resolved by lawmakers to achieve any compromise, the most significant being Republican demands for prohibitions on federally funded ACA marketplace plans from providing coverage for abortion services.

“You’ve got to deal with the Hyde issue,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said Tuesday when talking about what he wants to see in the bill, in reference to the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funds from going directly to abortions.

Plans in some states, though, cover abortion — with Democrats and moderates arguing state and private funds cover those plan costs.

This is unacceptable for Democrats, who assert that existing legislation adequately guarantees that only state and private funds are allocated for abortion services.

President Trump bolstered the aspirations of GOP moderates to resolve the deadlock on abortion and achieve a bipartisan agreement by urging House Republicans in a speech on Tuesday to exhibit “flexibility on Hyde” regarding health care discussions.

The Hyde Amendment is not the sole obstacle, as Thune stated on Tuesday that any agreement capable of securing a “healthy majority” in the Senate must encompass several reforms.

He seeks to establish income thresholds for eligibility for subsidies.

He indicated the necessity of prohibiting ACA plans from providing $0 premiums to mitigate issues related to automatic enrollees who are oblivious to their coverage, thereby ensuring that insurance companies cannot exploit the system by auto-enrolling individuals and subsequently receiving direct financial benefits.

Thune expressed a desire for a “bridge” to health savings accounts, facilitating increased financial resources for consumers to purchase plans directly, rather than directing funds to insurance companies.

Iran “Activates” Special Mode: A Worrying Signal for the U.S. and Israel?
Iran “Activates” Special Mode: A Worrying Signal for the U.S. and Israel? Officials at the Pentagon say Iran’s retaliatory attacks have dropped sharply, with missile launches down 90% and UAV deployments falling 83% compared to the early phase of the conflict. Range of several Iranian missiles (Photo: Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs). Bloomberg reported that the shift reflects lessons learned by the U.S. military from last summer’s confrontation with Iran. U.S. and Israeli commanders identified missile launchers as a key vulnerability, shifting strategy toward destroying launch platforms, underground silos, and command centers rather than relying solely on air defense interception. At first glance, the data appears to support that view. On the first day of fighting (Feb. 28), Iran launched 309 missiles, followed by 584 on day two. But from March 9 to 17, the number dropped to an average of just 30 missiles per day. Chart showing the number of weapons launched by Iran at the UAE as of March 17. Blue bars represent missiles, while yellow bars indicate UAVs (Photo: ISW). Iran “Activating” a Special Mode? Retired U.S. Army Col. Douglas MacGregor, a former Pentagon adviser during the first administration of Donald Trump, offered a different perspective. He suggested the decline may partly reflect missile depletion—but not entirely. Iran may also be running out of high-value U.S. targets after damaging infrastructure, command-and-control systems, radar installations, and air defense batteries such as Patriot and THAAD across the region. Questions about Iran’s missile and UAV stockpiles have become a major concern for U.S. and Israeli intelligence, though Tehran keeps such information tightly guarded. According to The Guardian, Iran rejected two ceasefire messages from Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff, as its leadership believes it is not losing the war and that the White House is under growing political pressure. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi added that unilateral claims of victory by Trump would not end the conflict—suggesting Tehran may be prepared to continue hostilities in some form, including tightening control over commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran launches a massive wave of missile strikes in retaliation for the killing of senior leaders and top commanders (Photo: ISW). A War of Attrition An analysis by Center for Strategic and International Studies, cited by Military Watch Magazine, describes the conflict as “a race to see who runs out of ammunition first.” Analyst Mark Cancian argues that Iran’s offensive missile stockpile may far exceed the interceptor inventories of the U.S. and its allies. In fact, the U.S. entered the conflict with already strained air defense reserves. By early 2025, the Pentagon reportedly had around 600 THAAD interceptors remaining—each costing about $12.6 million—with more than 150 used in just 12 days of fighting with Iran in June 2025. Supplies for Patriot systems had also dropped to roughly 25% of required levels by mid-2025, according to Pentagon assessments. Sources cited by CBS News said that while Washington is aware of severe interceptor shortages among Gulf allies, little has been done to address the issue. Meanwhile, Middle East Eye reported that the U.S. declined requests from some Gulf states for additional weapons and ammunition—potentially reflecting shortages and a prioritization of defending U.S. and Israeli positions. Why Isn’t Iran Escalating? Given these conditions, Iran could theoretically strike U.S. bases and interests across the Middle East with fewer constraints. So why hasn’t it intensified attacks? One possible explanation: Tehran may have “activated” a form of strategic restraint—conserving missiles for a longer war. How Large Is Iran’s Arsenal? Russian analysts estimate Iran possesses at least 5,000 missiles of various types. Tehran appears to be using them selectively: Short-range targets (250–350 km) such as U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain: Fateh-110 and Fateh-313—light, mobile, and highly accurate. Medium-range targets (~600 km) in Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia: Zolfaghar (700 km range) and Qiyam-1 (800 km). Long-range strikes (1,200–1,600 km) against Israel: Khorramshahr-4 ballistic missiles with a 2,000 km range and heavy payloads, capable of evading air defenses in the terminal phase. Iran is the only country in the region with a fully domestic precision-guided missile production chain. It is believed to be producing around 100 ballistic missiles per month, with much of its manufacturing hidden in underground facilities operating around the clock. The Bigger Question In this asymmetric war, the central question remains: Who will run out first—the United States and its allies, or Iran?