“The US apparently loves to strike Muslim countries during Ramadan and I am convinced it isn’t what these countries have done to violate international law but about who they worship,” she added.

Critics argue that such rhetoric, delivered during an active military standoff, risks giving adversaries propaganda they can weaponize.

Under the Constitution, treason is narrowly defined as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Legal scholars have long noted that the “aid and comfort” standard requires intent and tangible support, not merely controversial speech.

Still, opponents contend that accusing the United States of religiously motivated warfare while American forces face potential retaliation could be construed as echoing hostile narratives advanced by the Iranian regime.

They argue that when a sitting member of Congress frames U.S. military action as anti-Muslim aggression, it may embolden adversaries and undermine American diplomatic leverage.

Supporters of Omar counter that political speech, even sharp criticism of U.S. foreign policy, is protected under the First Amendment. They note that courts have historically set an extraordinarily high bar for proving treason, requiring overt acts and clear evidence of intentional alignment with an enemy power.

The debate underscores the tension between protected political expression and rhetoric that critics say risks crossing into dangerous territory during moments of international crisis.

Users quickly pointed out that the U.S. invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush began March 20, 2003, seven months before Ramadan that year.

They also noted that President George H.W. Bush launched Operation Desert Storm on Jan. 17, 1991, roughly two months before Ramadan began that year, a campaign that ultimately liberated Kuwait.

“Claiming America ‘chooses Ramadan to attack Muslims’ is not advocacy, it is a deliberate lie meant to inflame anger and divide Americans,” said Dalia al-Aqidi, a Muslim Iraqi-American running against Omar for her House seat.

The episode is not the first time the Minnesota Democrat and ‘Squad’ member has faced scrutiny over factual claims.

Earlier this year, when pressed on Capitol Hill about a $9 billion social services fraud case in her district, Omar disputed the premise and challenged a reporter’s understanding of the figures.

“Your brain has told you that it is possible for half of the resources for our public service to have disappeared? Listen to yourself,” she said.

Last fall, responding on TikTok to questions about her family’s reported wealth, Omar said critics misread her financial disclosure forms and argued that a listed valuation reflected her husband’s company’s total worth rather than his ownership stake.

“Learn to read before you post misleading s–t,” she said.

Omar’s latest comments came as the United States Department of State advised U.S. Embassy personnel in Israel to depart the region Friday “while commercial flights are available,” signaling potential airspace closures amid anticipated strikes or retaliatory action from Iran.