Logo

Texas GOP Nominee Under Fire After Shocking Discovery Inside His Home Collection.

Republican congressional nominee Brandon Herrera is facing criticism after discussing and displaying a copy of Mein Kampf during a recent appearance on the Unsubscribe Podcast.
Article image

Herrera, who is running for Congress in Texas’ 23rd District, spoke with a fellow firearms YouTuber known as “AK Guy” about their personal book collections. During the conversation, Herrera held up a photo on his phone and said the book was kept in his home alongside World War II–era German stick grenades.

“That’s my copy… that’s in my house next to the German stick grenades,” Herrera said, adding that he owns a 1939 English-language edition of the book “just because I thought it was wild.”

Mein Kampf, written by Adolf Hitler while he was imprisoned in the 1920s, is widely regarded as the ideological foundation of Nazi Germany and has long been associated with the regime’s antisemitic and extremist views.

During the podcast, Herrera also criticized major tech platforms, noting that the book could not easily be purchased through Amazon while works like The Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital were available.

Supporters of the podcast say discussions about historical artifacts or controversial books do not necessarily indicate political endorsement. Critics, however, argue that publicly showcasing such material in a casual setting raises questions about judgment, particularly for someone seeking public office.

Herrera is the Republican nominee in Texas’s competitive 23rd Congressional District, which stretches from San Antonio to El Paso and is considered one of the state’s most closely watched races.

The comments have sparked debate online about whether displaying historically controversial items in this context reflects poor judgment or is simply part of a broader discussion about history and free speech.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...

U.S. Navy Declines to Escort Ships Through the Strait of Hormuz Despite Trump’s Calls 👇
U.S. Navy Rebuffs White House on Hormuz Escort Mandate Amid Escalating Tensions WASHINGTON — Despite repeated assertions from President Donald Trump that the United States is prepared to safeguard transit through the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. Navy continues to reject requests for military escorts of commercial vessels, citing prohibitive operational risks. The move comes as the global shipping industry pleads for intervention following the flare-up of conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. According to sources within the maritime industry, the Navy has been turning away daily requests for protection, warning that the threat environment in the narrow waterway remains too volatile to ensure safe passage. A "Mission Impossible" The impasse has effectively paralyzed one of the world’s most critical maritime arteries, which facilitates roughly 20% of global oil transit. The resulting supply squeeze has pushed global oil prices to their highest levels since 2022. While President Trump has publicly maintained that Washington stands ready to escort tankers "when necessary," the military’s leadership has adopted a markedly more cautious tone. Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, noted that the Pentagon is still evaluating potential options but has yet to authorize formal escort operations. Maritime security analysts warn that securing the Strait may currently be a "mission impossible." Iran’s reliance on asymmetrical warfare—specifically low-cost, hard-to-detect naval mines and swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)—presents a formidable challenge even for a multi-national coalition. Mixed Signals from Washington The confusion in the U.S. strategy was underscored recently when Energy Secretary Chris Wright took to social media platform X to claim the first successful U.S.-led escort mission. The post was deleted shortly thereafter, fueling industry concerns about a disconnect between the White House and the Pentagon. As of today, the majority of maritime traffic remains stalled, with hundreds of vessels anchored outside the chokepoint. While the Pentagon has vowed to target Iranian mine-laying capabilities, analysts argue that a prolonged closure of the Strait could result in catastrophic consequences for the global energy market. Would you like me to analyze the specific economic implications of a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz on global inflation, or perhaps detail the specific asymmetric threats posed by the IRGC in this theater?