Logo

Trump Admin Investigating Omar For Allegedly Marrying Brother to Illegally Enter US

Trump Admin Investigating Omar For Allegedly Marrying Brother to Illegally Enter US

Trump administration border czar Tom Homan said this week that the Department of Homeland Security is reviewing allegations that Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed immigration fraud by entering into a marriage with a relative.
President Donald Trump and several of his allies have long asserted that Omar’s first husband, Ahmed Elmi, is her brother and that the marriage, which began in 2009 and ended in divorce in 2017, was arranged to facilitate immigration benefits.

No DNA evidence or official documentation has substantiated those claims, and Omar has consistently denied them.

In an interview with Newsmax, Homan said he is examining whether Omar violated immigration laws and whether her legal status could be affected. Omar’s congressional biography states that she arrived in the United States with her family in the 1990s after fleeing civil war in Somalia.

“We’re pulling the records, we’re pulling the files,” Homan said Monday. “We’re looking at it … I’m running that down this week.”

Homan stated that the DHS is conducting a thorough review of visa fraud within the Somali community in Minnesota, following the department’s claim that 50% of visas issued in Minnesota may be fraudulent.

“President Trump has instructed us to go down, and we’re going to deep dive all of this, and we’re going to hold people accountable,” he noted.

Trump accused the Somali-born congresswoman of marrying her brother to commit immigration fraud during a new interview with Politico released Tuesday.

“I don’t want to see a woman that, you know, marries her brother to get in and then becomes a congressman, does nothing but complain,” Trump said in the interview with Politico’s Dasha Burns, referring to Omar’s alleged 2009 marriage to Ahmed Elmi, who multiple reports and witnesses have claimed is her biological brother.
Trump made the remarks after Omar condemned recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Minneapolis targeting illegal Somali nationals—a crackdown that followed revelations of a $1 billion welfare fraud scheme in Minnesota, portions of which federal investigators say were funneled to the Somali terror group al-Shabaab.

“All she does is complain, complain, complain, and yet her country is a mess,” Trump continued. “Let her go back, fix up her own country. So no, Somalia—and I was right about it.”

The president also accused Minnesota’s Democratic Gov. Tim Walz of failing to address the crisis: “They have an incompetent governor there, too.”

Omar has previously called the allegations “baseless and absurd,” dismissing them as Islamophobic conspiracy theories.

But a 2019 Minneapolis Star-Tribune investigation found discrepancies in Omar’s marital and immigration records that she has never fully explained.


According to public records and Daily Mail reporting, Omar married Elmi in a civil ceremony in 2009 while still religiously married to her first husband, Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi. She claimed to have separated from Elmi in 2011, yet did not file for divorce until 2017.

During that time, she and Hirsi had a third child together. Omar later divorced Hirsi again in 2019 after reports surfaced of her affair with political consultant Tim Mynett, whom she later married.

In February 2020, the Daily Mail published explosive testimony from Abdihakim Osman, a Somali community leader in Minneapolis, who said Omar openly told friends that Elmi was her brother and that she “needed to get papers for him to stay in the United States.”

Osman told the outlet, “No one knew there had been a wedding until the media turned up the certificate years later.”

Osman described Elmi as “very feminine in the way he dressed,” saying the Somali community was shocked to learn he had married Omar. “When Ilhan married Elmi, no one even knew about it,” Osman said. “She kept it quiet because an imam would have refused to marry them if he knew they were related.”

Trump to Seek Millions In Damages From Fani Willis After Botched Prosecution

President Donald Trump is seeking nearly $6.3 million from Fulton County, Georgia, in connection with a dismissed case against him, which was pursued by District Attorney Fani Willis. In 2023, Willis indicted Trump under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, alleging that he acted illegally in his efforts to contest the results of the 2020 presidential election.

 
 

The case was eventually dismissed, and in December 2024, the Georgia Court of Appeals stated that a lower court had erred in allowing Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who is also her romantic partner, to choose between stepping aside, according to the website Law and Crime.

The court ruled that the “significant appearance of impropriety” meant Willis and her office should be “wholly disqualified.” Willis appealed that decision but she lost in court.

This led to a motion seeking to recover $6.3 million in attorneys’ fees, referencing a Georgia law that stipulates that when a district attorney is dismissed, the defendant in the case “shall” be entitled to a payout.

The motion filed on Wednesday by attorney Steve Sadow, representing Trump, spans three pages and includes approximately 200 pages of attachments detailing the costs Trump seeks reimbursement for.

Arguing the law “mandates such recovery when a prosecuting attorney is disqualified due to improper conduct and the case is dismissed,” the motion said Willis launched a “politically motivated, lengthy investigation.”

 

“This dismissal paves the way for the award of reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses,” the motion said.

“Each of the necessary elements have been met: DA Willis was disqualified based upon improper conduct, the criminal case was dismissed, and the criminal case was pending when the statute went into effect. This motion is timely filed,” the document added, noting as well that co-defendants in the case can also seek reimbursement.


“President Trump intends to adopt the motions for attorney fees and costs filed by his co-defendants,” a footnote said. “He will do so in a separate pleading after all such motions are filed.”

The statute states that when a prosecutor is “disqualified due to improper conduct on the part of such prosecuting attorney” and the case is summarily “dismissed by the court or a subsequent prosecutor tasked with prosecuting such case following such disqualification,” then “any defendant against whom such charges are dismissed shall be entitled to an award of all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the defendant in defending the case.”

In an interview with Law & Crime, Sadow said the case was “rightfully dismissed.”

“In accordance with Georgia law, President Trump has moved the Court to award reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in his defense of the politically motivated, and now rightfully dismissed case brought by disqualified Fani Willis,” he said.

Sadow acknowledged that this is a setback for taxpayers but noted that they are suffering due to Willis attempting to leverage her prosecution to advance her career.

“Of course, I feel for them. Unfortunately, for them as well, they made the choice for Fani Willis,” he said, according to WAGA-TV.

 

“Fani Willis brought this politically motivated, ill-fated case. She got disqualified; she lost. And the law says, now her office has to pay for her conduct,” he said.

Willis plans to intervene in the case regarding reimbursement, according to reports.

Willis last month mounted an aggressive defense of her failed prosecution of Trump and his allies, testifying for more than three hours before a Georgia Senate panel investigating her conduct in the high-profile election interference case.

The appearance before the Senate Special Committee on Investigations marked Willis’ first testimony under oath in the nearly two-year inquiry into her office’s handling of the Trump prosecution, her relationship with former special prosecutor Nathan Wade, and allegations of political coordination with the Biden administration.

“I know you are somewhat offended that I had the audacity to prosecute these folks that came into my county and committed crimes,” Willis told senators in a defiant tone. “But this wasn’t special to me. This was another day of business.”


U.S. Marines Head to Middle East: A Bold Plan Taking Shape?
U.S. Marines Head to Middle East: A Bold Plan Taking Shape? U.S. Marine forces are expected to arrive in the Middle East next week to help Washington reopen the Strait of Hormuz or carry out other covert missions, according to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal. U.S. Marines conduct a small-boat raid exercise in Okinawa, Japan, last month (Photo: U.S. military). Amid soaring global oil and gas prices driven by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, President Donald Trump is pressing aides and allies to find solutions—potentially with the U.S. Marine Corps playing a central role. According to the WSJ, the Pentagon has deployed the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), a rapid-response force of about 2,200 Marines based in Okinawa, Japan, to the Middle East. The move is seen as preparation for a potential military operation targeting Iran, aimed at securing control of the Strait of Hormuz, Kharg Island, and other strategic islands. These locations could serve as staging grounds or defensive bases against Iranian attacks on commercial shipping. The MEU is a self-contained force of roughly 2,200 personnel, integrating ground troops, aviation, and logistics. As a core element of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF), it can operate independently from the sea, conducting amphibious assaults, evacuations, or high-intensity combat without immediate resupply. Its four main components include: Ground Combat Element: Marines equipped with armored vehicles and artilleryAviation Combat Element: Aircraft such as the MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor, helicopters, and F-35B fighter jetsCommand Element: Coordinates operationsLogistics Combat Element: Provides essential support, supplies, and maintenance The unit is particularly specialized in amphibious and airborne assault operations. Strait of Hormuz: Economic and Military Flashpoint Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—a critical waterway through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and gas flows—has dealt a heavy blow to the global economy, driving up fuel prices and creating a major military and political challenge for the Trump administration. U.S. forces are attempting to reopen the strait by targeting Tehran’s threat capabilities, including anti-ship missile sites, missile production and storage facilities, drones, and naval mines. The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) says about 50,000 U.S. troops are currently deployed in the Middle East as part of the conflict with Iran. Since launching operations on February 28, the Pentagon has conducted more than 7,800 airstrikes, damaging or destroying over 120 Iranian vessels, according to a March 18 report from CENTCOM. Most recently, on March 17, U.S. forces dropped bunker-buster bombs weighing more than two tons on fortified Iranian coastal positions used to store anti-ship cruise missiles. Despite nearly three weeks of U.S.-Israeli strikes, Iran continues to target American forces and their allies in the region. Caitlin Talmadge of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology noted: “The U.S. has carried out thousands of sorties, but we are still not certain that all of Iran’s capabilities have been eliminated.” Washington’s Strategic Options Deploying a combat-ready unit like the 31st MEU gives President Trump additional options to pressure Tehran. Iran controls several small islands off its southern coast, where it maintains oil infrastructure and missile bases. First, Kharg Island: Covering about 25 square kilometers, this island is Iran’s most economically vital, located roughly 20 km off its southwest coast in the Persian Gulf. It serves as the country’s primary oil export hub. On March 16, Trump threatened to strike its pipelines after U.S. forces had already targeted key military facilities there the previous week. Rather than destroying Kharg’s oil infrastructure, U.S. Marines could seize the island and use it as leverage to reopen the strait. Retired General Frank McKenzie explained: “The U.S. could destroy the oil infrastructure, which would cause irreparable damage to Iran’s economy and the global economy, or seize it as a bargaining chip without permanently harming global markets.” Such an operation could be carried out by sea, with the amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli deploying landing craft and Marines. Alternatively, it could be conducted primarily by air, using MV-22 Ospreys and helicopters capable of vertical takeoff and landing from ships or nearby Gulf states. Vice Admiral John Miller added: “U.S. Marines could also be deployed to seize control of other islands within the strait, positioning forces to intercept Iranian fast boats and shoot down missiles threatening maritime traffic.” Kharg Island serves as a key transshipment hub for delivering Iranian crude oil to major Asian markets (Photo: Google Maps). Second, Qeshm Island: Located at the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, it serves as a safe harbor for Iranian naval forces and missiles, and hosts a major desalination plant. Its size and location allow Tehran to control shipping flows. Third, Kish Island: A smaller economic hub west of Qeshm, featuring an airport. Fourth, Hormuz Island: Situated east of Qeshm, where Iran stations small attack vessels. Nicole Grajewski of Sciences Po noted that many of these locations are heavily fortified or were previously abandoned sites dating back to the Shah’s era. Positioning Marines on offshore islands—rather than inside Iranian territory—could offer a loophole allowing Trump to claim he is keeping his promise not to deploy ground troops into Iran. “I don’t see them going into Iran proper,” Miller said. “But deploying to surrounding islands in the Gulf could provide tactical advantages for a period of time.” Potential Operation: A Daring Mission to Seize Nuclear Material So far, the Trump administration has declined to disclose the exact purpose of deploying Marines to the Middle East. However, some sources suggest the president is considering another ground operation: seizing or destroying near weapons-grade nuclear material reportedly stored deep beneath a mountain in Isfahan. According to The New York Times, “by any measure, this would be one of the boldest and riskiest military operations in modern U.S. history.” A major complication is that no one is certain where all the nuclear material is located. If storage containers are breached, the released gas could be both toxic and radiologically destructive. If stored too closely together, there is also a risk of triggering a nuclear chain reaction. Following extensive U.S. and Israeli strikes on its military infrastructure, Iran may now view its nuclear material as one of its final lines of defense. George Perkovich of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said: “They need it more than ever—and are prepared to defend it.” He added that Iran appears to have carefully planned ahead of U.S.-Israeli operations, meaning Washington should assume Tehran has done the same for its nuclear storage sites.