Logo

TRUMP’S PRIVATE ADVISER: THE UNFILTERED TRUTH BEHIND THE CRISIS

TRUMP’S PRIVATE ADVISER: THE UNFILTERED TRUTH BEHIND THE CRISIS

Có thể là hình ảnh về Phòng Bầu dục

Former President Donald Trump is facing renewed scrutiny following reports that conversations with his son-in-law and former White House adviser Jared Kushner may have influenced how the administration interpreted Iran’s intentions during a period of rising tensions.

According to remarks attributed to Trump in recent discussions about the origins of the conflict, he suggested that Kushner’s assessment contributed to his belief that Iran might be preparing hostile actions against the United States. The comment has fueled debate about the internal decision-making process inside the administration.

In most administrations, major national security decisions are guided by extensive intelligence briefings and recommendations from agencies such as the CIA, the Defense Department, and the National Security Council. These institutions are responsible for analyzing threats and advising presidents on diplomatic and military options.

Critics say Trump’s reference to Kushner’s views raises questions about whether informal advisers held significant influence over policy decisions involving Iran. Kushner served as a senior White House adviser during Trump’s presidency and was closely involved in Middle East diplomacy.

Officials familiar with past discussions say that during the same period, some diplomats believed negotiations with Iran might still produce a stronger nuclear agreement than previous deals. However, they warned that reaching such an agreement would require additional time and sustained diplomatic engagement.

Those briefings reportedly highlighted several complex issues surrounding the negotiations, including disagreements among negotiators, overlapping global crises, and the need for technical expertise from nuclear and regional specialists during talks.

At the same time, regional tensions were rising, and the timeline for diplomatic decisions was becoming increasingly compressed. Reports suggested that the administration faced pressure to quickly determine whether negotiations could succeed or whether other options should be considered.

Supporters of the administration argue that Kushner played a key role in several diplomatic initiatives in the Middle East and maintained close contact with regional leaders. They say his involvement was part of a broader effort to reshape U.S. policy in the region.

The episode underscores ongoing debates in Washington about how foreign policy decisions are made and the balance between formal intelligence processes and informal advice from trusted political allies. Analysts say those questions are likely to remain central to discussions about the administration’s approach to Iran.

Comments (0)

Loading comments...

U.S. May Be Spending Nearly $900 Million Per Day in Conflict With Iran
U.S. May Be Spending Nearly $900 Million Per Day in Conflict With Iran A U.S.-based think tank estimates Washington spent roughly $3.7 billion in the first four days of its campaign against Iran—equivalent to about $891 million per day. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said in a March 5 analysis that the United States spent approximately $3.7 billion during the first 100 hours of operations against Iran, a period typically considered the most intense phase of an air campaign. Of that total, operational costs were estimated at around $196 million, with a significant portion already accounted for in the fiscal year 2026 defense budget. Ammunition replenishment made up the bulk of spending at roughly $3.1 billion, while equipment losses and infrastructure repairs were estimated at about $350 million—most of which has not yet been budgeted. A U.S. fighter jet takes off from an aircraft carrier (Photo: U.S. Central Command) Air operations accounted for a substantial share of overall costs. CSIS estimates that in the first 100 hours alone, the U.S. military spent about $125 million on aircraft sorties, with at least $30 million per day expected thereafter. Roughly 200 U.S. military aircraft are currently engaged in operations across the Middle East, including F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters, F-15E Strike Eagle heavy strike aircraft, F-16 Fighting Falcon multirole fighters, and A-10 Thunderbolt II ground-attack planes. The U.S. Navy has also deployed significant forces to the region, including two aircraft carriers, 14 destroyers, and three littoral combat ships. Operating the naval fleet cost approximately $64.5 million over the first four days, with daily costs estimated at $15 million thereafter. The U.S. military is believed to have used more than 2,000 weapons in the first 100 hours of strikes against Iran. CSIS estimates an average of 1.3 munitions per target, suggesting total usage could reach up to 2,600 weapons. Replenishing these munitions alone could cost around $1.5 billion. A U.S. warship launches cruise missiles toward Iran (Photo: U.S. Central Command) Missile and drone interception has also proven costly. Tehran is estimated to have launched around 500 missiles and 2,000 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), with interception largely carried out by the Patriot missile system and THAAD systems. Replenishing interceptor stockpiles could cost an additional $1.7 billion, according to CSIS. Confirmed U.S. equipment losses remain relatively limited. The most notable incident involved three F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft reportedly lost to friendly fire over Kuwait. With production of the F-15E halted in favor of the newer F-15EX variant, replacing the lost aircraft could cost approximately $309 million. Some U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and Qatar were also damaged in Iranian strikes, with repair costs estimated at no less than $50 million. CSIS analysts say costs may begin to stabilize after the initial high-intensity phase of the conflict, depending on whether the U.S. shifts to less expensive weapons and on the scale and effectiveness of Iran’s retaliation. However, much of the spending has yet to be incorporated into the current defense budget, meaning the U.S. government will likely need additional funding. CSIS said the Pentagon may seek supplemental appropriations or budget adjustments from Congress to cover the costs. The United States and Israel launched a coordinated air campaign against Iran on Feb. 28, reportedly killing several senior military and political figures, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The strikes triggered a sharp retaliatory response from Tehran targeting Israeli territory and U.S. bases across the Middle East. A U.S. F-15 Eagle fires during an incident over Kuwait on March 2 (Photo: The Times of Israel, X/AMK Mapping) The conflict shows no signs of easing, with Washington urging Israel to continue the campaign “to the end,” while Tehran has vowed to stop only after delivering what it calls a “decisive blow” to the United States.